It is not uncommon for a company’s leadership team to look at safety management and their safety culture and ask: do we have a good safety culture? How do we improve it? How do we measure it? These questions can be difficult and elusive to answer because, like any culture, safety culture is built around many factors, including attitudes, accountability, leadership and other “soft” components that cannot be easily measured. However, it is strongly affected by another, more measurable factor: finding and fixing problems. By focusing on this key element, organizations can gain meaningful insight into the health of their safety culture.

Why? Because when you measure findings and fix performance, establish accountability and take action on findings, you are demonstrating commitment to providing a safe workplace. This in turn leads to positive employee attitudes towards better safety management and an overall healthier safety culture.

How a Single, Automated Database – Safety Management Software – Improves Finding and Fixing


Let’s be honest, finding and fixing is not complicated. It is identifying the problems (or hazards) and then figuring out a way to fix them that can get a little complicated. To track this data, many organizations often employ various systems, including paper files, spreadsheets, home-grown databases, siloed site-level or regional safety solutions and other potentially cumbersome systems.

These measures present a challenge. When data is stored in this disparate manner, it is difficult to obtain the “big picture” needed to assess progress. While management may feel as if they are promoting a positive safety culture, the disparate systems approach is likely hindering their ability to make well-informed decisions. This has a detrimental impact on safety culture because there might be an important missing piece that was never seen in the big picture.

To obtain useful insight on finding & fixing, organizations should utilize a single, automated database to record safety program data. With this type of safety inspection software, incident management software or health safety management software, all pertinent data is efficiently tracked and managed, and, most importantly, managers can obtain valuable reports that can help improve performance. Effective safety software that can be configured to adapt to the organization’s business processes also promotes effective workflows which support the mandate of enhancing safety culture.

Some organizations opt to build their own database in-house for safety management. While this solution can appear to be the most cost-effective up front, it can quickly become laborious and draining on resources in the future. There are good off-the-shelf options available such as safety inspection software, incident management software and health safety management software, that have been specifically designed to support safety program improvements.

The key is to look for safety software that can adapt and align with your business processes through configuration and tailoring options. Let’s evaluate the ways in which an automated safety system can be leveraged to support the main components of good finding and fixing. These three imperatives are:

  • Understanding the Healthy Balance
  • Standardizing the Effective Hazard Identification and Correction Process
  • Effectively Prioritizing Actions Based on Risk



    Understanding the Healthy Balance


    It is important in safety management for an organization to balance its tendency to find problems with its ability to fix them. If the scales tip too much one way or the other, the effect can be detrimental to the company’s safety culture. By placing too much emphasis on finding problems, and not having the appropriate resources to fix them quickly and effectively, an organization will likely find itself with an apathetic and disengaged workforce. In such environments, it’s not uncommon to hear workers say “why bother suggesting that safety enhancement, nobody will ever fix it…” or “it takes forever to get anything fixed around here…” Each time a negative statement like this is uttered, the safety culture foundation suffers another crack.

    On the other hand, not placing enough emphasis on finding hazards can also tip the scales. You may be familiar with the saying, “if we have no problems, then we have a problem.” An organization needs standardized programs and systems to identify hazards in the workplace and then subsequently mitigate them. Solving problems is the essence of improvement. Furthermore, if employees see action being taken on problems they’ve identified, they will feel engaged and confident about their company’s dedication to worker safety and they will be encouraged to continue actively participating. To understand what the balance is at your organization, it comes down to having reliable information on your inputs and outputs. By using a single, automated safety data management system, you’ll be able to easily extract information that will tell you how healthy your balance is. Here are some of the metrics used to assess balance:

    Safety Management Inputs



  • Number of items found at each risk level
  • Number of audits performed vs. targets
  • Number of audits by area, auditor, and/or topic
  • Number of safety observations

    Safety Management Outputs


  • How long items take to fix
  • Number of open / overdue corrective actions
  • Number of open / overdue corrective actions by area
  • Total number of safety corrective actions by area, time range, etc.

    Standardizing the Effective Hazard Identification and Correction Process


    Most large organizations use various methods to identify hazards, including incident management and incident investigations, audits, inspections, and suggestion programs. However, the data collected is often stored in different places and formats, which leads to poor data integrity and inconsistent business processes being used by your HSE / EHS team.

    With one safety inspection software, incident management software or health safety management software solution, organizations can streamline and standardize workflows and data collection. As a result, you’ll be able to extract better information and make more informed business decisions. Here are some of the benefits of using an automated safety system for your hazard identification process:

  • Standardize the collection, storage, and retrieval of hazard information.
  • Allow employees to anonymously report incidents from stand-alone stations placed throughout the work place to kick start the incident investigation process in the main database.
  • Conduct causal analysis of the hazard so preventative or system-wide actions can be considered along with more immediate corrective actions.
  • Automate e-mail notifications to ensure responsible individuals and departments are aware of their assigned actions and the corresponding completion status.
  • Generate reports to monitor completion statuses and ensure fixes don’t fall through the cracks.

    Effectively Prioritizing Actions Based on Risk


    No organization has the resources to fix all its hazards immediately – this is simply not a realistic approach. The key to good risk management lies in prioritizing actions based on risk and allocating resources accordingly. But how do you identify risk priority if your data is being tracked in various places and formats? It likely takes hours, even days, to organize the information in a way that it will tell you the appropriate actions to take and when.


    SOURCE:

    https://ohsonline.com/Articles/2018/09/09/Three-Imperatives-to-Successful-Safety-Management.aspx?admgarea=news&Page=1